Aviator vs JetX vs Lucky Jet vs Spaceman: how crash games differ
Aviator defined the genre, but it isn't the only one in it. We compare providers, RTP, and signature features of seven of the most popular crash games.
JetX — one of Aviator's most direct alternatives. All 7 games compared below
Comparison table
| Game | Provider | Stated RTP | Signature feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aviator | Spribe | ~97% | dual betting, live chat, the genre's originator |
| JetX | SmartSoft Gaming | ~97% | up to 3 simultaneous bets, multiplier cap up to 25,000x |
| Lucky Jet | various studios (often branded under 1win) | ~97% | a cosmonaut character instead of a plane, strong on RU/CIS markets |
| Spaceman | Pragmatic Play | ~96–97% | a "half" partial cash-out option, more conservative UX |
| Aviamasters | BGaming | ~97% | no manual cash-out — automatic flight along a set route, 250x cap (1000x in Aviamasters 2) |
| Aviatrix | Turbo Games | ~97% | similar mechanics, a different visual setting |
| Crash | 100Hp Gaming | ~98% (portfolio-wide) | younger provider (since 2023) built specifically for crash/instant games, crypto-friendly |
What all crash games have in common
Despite different visual themes (a plane, a cosmonaut, a rocket), all the games listed here run on the same core mechanic that Aviator largely defined for the genre: a multiplier climbing from 1.00x, a cash-out button you can hit at any moment, a random crash, and a provably fair algorithm guaranteeing the result wasn't manipulated after the fact. The difference between these games isn't in the underlying risk — it's in interface details, limits, and signature features.
Aviator (Spribe)
Aviator is the originator of the current wave of crash games and still the genre's most recognizable title. Its standout features include the signature dual bet (two independent tickets in one round) and a noticeably richer social layer: live chat, top-win statistics, and the Aviarace tournament mechanic. See our full breakdown on the main review page.
JetX (SmartSoft Gaming)
One of Aviator's most direct competitors by popularity. The key difference is up to three simultaneous bets instead of two, plus a stated multiplier cap of up to 25,000x. Higher than the practical limits at most Aviator operators, though in practice only a handful of rounds out of thousands ever get close.
JetX's interface: the same rising-multiplier idea, but its own visual style and a round-history strip on the left
Lucky Jet
Same mechanics, different wrapper: instead of a plane, a cosmonaut character flies upward. It's especially popular in Russia and CIS markets, often bundled with specific operators such as 1win.
Lucky Jet: the same rising-multiplier idea, but a cosmonaut instead of a plane and a purple color scheme
Spaceman (Pragmatic Play)
Here the edge is the provider's brand itself. Pragmatic Play is one of the industry's largest players, and for part of the audience that's a trust factor on its own — scale and reputation, not just mechanics. Interface-wise, it offers a "half" partial cash-out option, letting you lock in part of your winnings while leaving the rest of the bet in play. The overall UX leans more conservative and restrained visually than Aviator's.
Aviamasters (BGaming)
This one genuinely plays differently from everything else on this list. Aviamasters has no manual cash-out button at all: you place a bet, the plane flies along a randomly calculated route, picks up multipliers along the way, dodges (or doesn't dodge) rockets, and the round's outcome — a safe landing (win) or a crash into the water (loss) — is decided automatically, with no input from you once the flight starts. Stated RTP sits around 97%, with a payout cap of 250x in the original version (up to 1000x in Aviamasters 2). If you're looking for the classic Aviator-style decision moment of "cash out now or not," this mechanic will feel unfamiliar — the risk sits entirely with the algorithm, not with your timing.
Aviamasters: multipliers and bonuses scattered along the flight path
Aviamasters 2: adds an "Activate Safe Landing" option and a higher multiplier cap
Aviatrix (Turbo Games)
Aviatrix is another close clone of Aviator's genre core from Turbo Games, with similar betting and cash-out mechanics but its own visual presentation. A good option for players who want the same core gameplay in a different wrapper, if a specific operator doesn't offer Aviator itself.
Aviatrix: a recognizable plane, but its own color palette and betting interface
Crash (100Hp Gaming)
100Hp Gaming is a relatively young provider (in the market since 2023, Curaçao-licensed) that built its catalog around crash and instant-win games from day one, rather than arriving in the genre from slots. Its portfolio runs to more than 20 titles, and the stated average RTP across the lineup is around 98% — higher than most games in this comparison. One practical detail worth noting: support for over 100 currencies, including crypto, which shows up right in the interface below.
Crash by 100Hp Gaming: a minimalist green-and-black interface, familiar manual cash-out mechanics
How to pick a game for you
You want a familiar interface
Aviator is the most recognizable, "reference" implementation of the genre, with the richest social layer.
You want flexibility in bet count
JetX offers up to three simultaneous bets instead of two.
Provider brand matters to you
Spaceman by Pragmatic Play is one of the industry's most recognizable gaming brands.
You don't want to decide the cash-out moment yourself
Aviamasters resolves automatically — no manual cash-out during the flight.
You play in crypto
Crash by 100Hp Gaming is built with crypto payments in mind and supports over 100 currencies.
FAQ
Which crash game is better — Aviator or its alternatives?
There's no clear "better" — the core mechanics and expected value are comparable across all of them; the real differences are in interface details, bet limits, and signature features. Aviator stands out as the most recognizable and socially rich implementation of the genre.
Do all crash games have the same RTP?
No, stated provider reference figures differ (roughly 96% to 98%), and within each range a specific operator can configure the value within limits its license allows.
Can I use the same strategy across different crash games?
Yes, the underlying bankroll-management principles and expected-value math are the same across the genre — see our Aviator strategies page for details.